Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Corporate media and the threat to democracy. Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. The internet and political campaigning: The new medium comes of age? Online Paper. Electronic democracy: The making of a revolution. E-democracy, an illusion to be pursued but never attained. Servaes (Ed.), The European information society. Issues in measuring information society adoption in Europe. Assessing e-government implementation processes: A pan-European survey of administrations officials. Netizens: On the history and impact of usenet and the internet. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois Society. The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. Politics and government: How people decide their fate.
DEMOCRACY 3 AFRICA TORRENT FREE
London: Free press of Glencoe.ĭeutsch, K. The nerves of government: Models of political communication and control. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.ĭeutsch, K. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.ĭahl, R. Comparing online activities in China and South Korea: The internet and the political regime. (Eds.) (2012), Connecting democracy: Online consultation and the flow of political communication (pp. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5 (1), 9–41. Reprinted in: Coleman, S., & Shane, P. Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ĭhadwick, A. Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Media, Culture and Society, 18, 249–268.Ĭhadwick, A. Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: Re-thinking communication and social policy. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Ĭalabrese, A., & Borchert, M. From broadcast to netcast: The internet and the flow of political information. Paper presented at the globalization of political communication skills and technologies conference (IPSA-ECPR joint conference), Sao Paulo, Brazil. No comment: The negative effects of online discussion dominators on e-democracy.
(1998), Toward an empirical map of political participation on the Internet, Paper presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Sept. The Internet and political transformation. ITIF the information technology & innovation foundation. Who’s who in internet politics: A taxonomy of information technology policy. Forester (Ed.), The Information technology revolution (pp. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īrterton F. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. The second argument concerns theories on political inclusion worldwide: this research has allowed to spot in 2005 a negative trend towards political exclusion which-as three consecutive Pew Research Centers reports proved in 2008, 20-got stronger, rather than weaker, in parallel to the emergence of social media. One is methodological: no other comparable empirical research covering the entire known universe of online political parties activities has been carried out after 2005. We argue however that this work remains scientifically relevant for two main reasons. This research is based on the early stages of the political web (1995–2005) and covers a context which pre-dates the emergence of modern social media. The tools used to carry out the analysis are Version 3.5 build 343 of WebLinkValidator and spss. The methodology used for this research is novel in this research arena and is based on an information architecture approach. This article contains research findings of the largest ( n = 2073) empirical research to date on the structures and the functions of political parties web sites from a political social and communication studies perspective.
0 kommentar(er)
